Book Details:
Author: Baird Smart
Release Date: August 6, 2024Series:
Genre: political legal thriller
Format: E-book
Pages: 371
Publisher: –
Blurb:
A Horrible Accident or Brilliantly Planned Social Statement
Ann Miller still grieves deeply five months after her son and only child was killed during the Virginia Tech mass shooting. A lifelong gun rights advocate, she works passionately as an executive for a gun rights organization, the American Rifle Society.
Read full book blurb
One morning, Miller opens an anonymous package containing an AK-47 assault rifle sent to her ARS department. Entering an executive boardroom to deliver the assault weapon to her boss during a departmental meeting, she sprays 50 bullets in a matter of seconds killing 13 of her colleagues.
Two FBI agents with vastly different personalities and investigative approaches lead the ultra-high-profile investigation to determine if the mass shooting was a horrible accident as Miller contends or a brilliantly planned and executed mass murder to bring worldwide attention to the destructive capability of automatic and semi-automatic weapons like killed her son. As the FBI’s investigation fails to uncover evidence that Miller pre-planned the shooting, the ARS spins the mass shooting events to characterize Miller as a mentally ill woman hellbent on avenging her son’s death.
Having killed everyone in the boardroom, Miller stands trial for 13 first-degree murders as both the perpetrator and only witness. A surprise piece of evidence surfaces at the end of the trial which renders a verdict but still leaves questions unanswered.
Review
Only Ann Knows by Baird Smart is a political legal thriller that examines a devastating workplace shooting through the conflicting perspectives of its alleged perpetrator, investigators, lawyers, politicians, journalists and jurors. When Ann Miller arrives at a meeting inside the headquarters of the American Rifle Society carrying an AK-47 delivered anonymously to her office, thirteen of her colleagues are killed. Ann insists that the shooting was an appalling accident triggered when an armed colleague fired first, but the extraordinary sequence of coincidences surrounding the event raises a question that grows more difficult rather than easier to answer: is Ann an traumatised survivor telling the truth, or an exceptionally intelligent woman who has constructed an almost flawless crime?
The novel’s greatest strength lies in its refusal to offer readers the comfort of an uncomplicated moral position. Ann’s grief, obsessive-compulsive behaviour and genuine horror at the deaths make her believable, yet Smart continually places small doubts beside the evidence supporting her account. Her unexplained time in Montana, evolving views on assault weapons, unusual knowledge of security procedures and decision to withhold a crucial piece of evidence can all be interpreted in more than one way. Even when the physical circumstances of the shooting become clearer, intention remains impossible to prove. The title consequently acquires greater significance as the story progresses.
Smart is equally effective in showing how truth becomes distorted once institutions begin competing to control it. The FBI wants a conclusive investigation, prosecutors face political pressure, the American Rifle Society needs to protect its influence, and the media transforms uncertainty into an international spectacle. Tucker Brown and Richard Smith provide an engaging investigative contrast: Tucker is abrasive, cynical and convinced of Ann’s guilt, while Richard remains more methodical and receptive to the possibility of an accident. Defence attorney Brenda Richardson is another strong presence, balancing the practical demands of Ann’s case against her own history of opposing expansive gun rights. The televised interview with Juror #6 creates an intelligent structural frame, allowing the public arguments surrounding the verdict to mirror the reader’s own uncertainty.
The novel is meticulously researched, although that thoroughness occasionally slows its momentum. Rooms, clothing, equipment, professional backgrounds and physical movements are frequently described at a level of detail that exceeds their narrative importance, while several secondary figures receive extensive introductions before their relevance becomes clear. The large cast and repeated restatement of investigative possibilities can also make the middle feel longer than necessary. A more selective approach to description, combined with some compression of recurring arguments and procedural explanations, would sharpen the suspense and allow Ann’s psychological complexity to remain more consistently at the forefront.
Nevertheless, Only Ann Knows is an ambitious and intellectually provocative thriller that understands how rarely evidence produces universal certainty in a politically divided society. Its conclusion does not provide an easy answer; instead, it leaves the reader in much the same position as the deadlocked jury, compelled to weigh fact against coincidence, remorse against calculation and reasonable doubt against instinct. Readers who enjoy detailed investigations, courtroom drama, morally ambiguous protagonists and novels willing to engage seriously with the politics of firearms should find this a thought-provoking and unsettling read.
I love reading your comments, so please go ahead…